Radeon RX 8800 XT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37not rated
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.80no data
Power efficiency24.73no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0
GPU code nameAD106Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43524096
Core clock speed2310 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate344.8622.1
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs136256
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores3464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length240 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 220 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RX 8800 XT, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
Radeon RX 8800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 800 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 76 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.