Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.43
+342%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35385
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.04no data
Power efficiency24.79no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameAD106Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43528
Core clock speed2310 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2535 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Wattno data
Texture fill rate344.8no data
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.43
+342%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22839
+342%
Arc Graphics 140V 5165

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+303%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 116054
+197%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+240%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+212%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD174
+335%
40
−335%
1440p94
+370%
20
−370%
4K57
+375%
12−14
−375%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.87no data
1440p5.31no data
4K8.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+204%
45
−204%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+166%
40−45
−166%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+270%
37
−270%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+341%
78
−341%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+329%
35−40
−329%
Metro Exodus 160
+332%
35−40
−332%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+218%
30−35
−218%
Valorant 260−270
+394%
50−55
−394%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+166%
40−45
−166%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+357%
30
−357%
Dota 2 163
+270%
44
−270%
Far Cry 5 139
+297%
35
−297%
Fortnite 230−240
+207%
75−80
−207%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+318%
65
−318%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+329%
35−40
−329%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+279%
43
−279%
Metro Exodus 127
+243%
35−40
−243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+117%
95−100
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+218%
30−35
−218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+324%
40−45
−324%
Valorant 260−270
+394%
50−55
−394%
World of Tanks 270−280
+55.9%
170−180
−55.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+166%
40−45
−166%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+448%
25
−448%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+131%
50−55
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 235
+312%
57
−312%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+329%
35−40
−329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+117%
95−100
−117%
Valorant 260−270
+394%
50−55
−394%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Dota 2 101
+461%
18
−461%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+405%
20−22
−405%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+475%
12−14
−475%
World of Tanks 350−400
+313%
95−100
−313%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+222%
27−30
−222%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+416%
30−35
−416%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+378%
30−35
−378%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+410%
21−24
−410%
Metro Exodus 119
+310%
27−30
−310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+433%
18−20
−433%
Valorant 230−240
+603%
30−35
−603%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Dota 2 101
+321%
24−27
−321%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+321%
24−27
−321%
Metro Exodus 48
+433%
9−10
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+436%
35−40
−436%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+321%
24−27
−321%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+533%
12−14
−533%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+518%
16−18
−518%
Fortnite 95−100
+540%
14−16
−540%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+321%
18−20
−321%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Valorant 130−140
+836%
14−16
−836%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 335% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 370% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 375% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 836% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 54 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.43 13.44
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 342.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1023 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.