Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4050 Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
32.25
+37.1%

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135217
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency51.1453.25
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD107AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1455 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate140.4129.6
Floating-point processing power8.986 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
Tensor Cores8064
Ray Tracing Cores2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4050 Mobile 32.25
+37.1%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 23.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+50.5%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4050 Mobile 85660
+29.2%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4050 Mobile 22400
+58.5%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4050 Mobile 8331
+57.8%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+37.1%
70−75
−37.1%
1440p50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
4K30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+38.9%
95−100
−38.9%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+42.1%
140−150
−42.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+37.3%
75−80
−37.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 124
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Counter-Strike 2 166
+38.3%
120−130
−38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Far Cry 5 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%
Fortnite 150−160
+40%
110−120
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 115
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+39%
100−105
−39%
Valorant 210−220
+40%
150−160
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Counter-Strike 2 112
+40%
80−85
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+38.5%
200−210
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+38%
50−55
−38%
Dota 2 169
+40.8%
120−130
−40.8%
Far Cry 5 118
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%
Fortnite 150−160
+40%
110−120
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+44%
75−80
−44%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%
Metro Exodus 85
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+39%
100−105
−39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%
Valorant 210−220
+40%
150−160
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Dota 2 162
+47.3%
110−120
−47.3%
Far Cry 5 109
+45.3%
75−80
−45.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+39%
100−105
−39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Valorant 138
+38%
100−105
−38%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+40%
110−120
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+41.2%
170−180
−41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Metro Exodus 50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Valorant 240−250
+43.5%
170−180
−43.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+40%
65−70
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Far Cry 5 69
+38%
50−55
−38%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+38.6%
70−75
−38.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Metro Exodus 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Valorant 210−220
+40.7%
150−160
−40.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Dota 2 115
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%

This is how RTX 4050 Mobile and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 37% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.25 23.52
Recency 3 January 2023 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3093 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.