ATI Radeon 9800 XT vs GeForce RTX 3080

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon 9800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080
2020
10 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
65.54
+43593%

RTX 3080 outperforms ATI 9800 XT by a whopping 43593% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking261426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.72no data
Power efficiency14.100.17
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGA102R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8704no data
Core clock speed1440 MHz412 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate465.13.296
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs968
TMUs2728
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount10 GB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz365 MHz
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s23.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 65.54
+43593%
ATI 9800 XT 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 25195
+44891%
ATI 9800 XT 56

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD168-0−1
1440p125-0−1
4K87-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.16no data
1440p5.59no data
4K8.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 0−1
Elden Ring 250−260 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 133 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 383 0−1
Metro Exodus 129 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 131 0−1
Valorant 277 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 125 0−1
Dota 2 147 0−1
Elden Ring 306 0−1
Far Cry 5 123 0−1
Fortnite 250−260 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 326 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 147 0−1
Metro Exodus 119 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 119 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180 0−1
Valorant 200 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 117 0−1
Dota 2 135 0−1
Far Cry 5 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 287 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220 0−1
Valorant 268 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 112 0−1
Elden Ring 181 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 112 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 84 0−1
World of Tanks 400−450
+44600%
1−2
−44600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1
Far Cry 5 160−170 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 219 0−1
Metro Exodus 107 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 0−1
Valorant 248 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Dota 2 143 0−1
Elden Ring 98 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 143 0−1
Metro Exodus 65 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 56 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 41 0−1
Dota 2 129 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Fortnite 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 135 0−1
Valorant 153 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.54 0.15
Recency 1 September 2020 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3080 has a 43593.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 XT, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Radeon 9800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6283 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.