RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3080

Place in the ranking	26	62
Place by popularity	93	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.23	no data
Power efficiency	14.13	29.57
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA102	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8704	5120
Core clock speed	1440 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	28,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	465.1	no data
Floating-point processing power	29.77 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	96	no data
TMUs	272	no data
Tensor Cores	272	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	68	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	285 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1188 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	760.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 65.40
+33%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 25229
+33%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 18975

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3080 53713
+29%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3080 39257
+34.2%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	169 +40.8%	120−130 −40.8%
1440p	127 +33.7%	95−100 −33.7%
4K	86 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.14	no data
1440p	5.50	no data
4K	8.13	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

120−130

+40%

90−95
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	111 +38.8%	80−85 −38.8%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +39.3%	150−160 −39.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +36.5%	85−90 −36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	138 +38%	100−105 −38%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +35.3%	85−90 −35.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +44.5%	110−120 −44.5%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +37.1%	170−180 −37.1%
Hitman 3	116 +36.5%	85−90 −36.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +34.4%	180−190 −34.4%
Metro Exodus	144 +44%	100−105 −44%
Red Dead Redemption 2	131 +37.9%	95−100 −37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +35.5%	200−210 −35.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	248 +37.8%	180−190 −37.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	96 +37.1%	70−75 −37.1%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +39.3%	150−160 −39.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +36.5%	85−90 −36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	134 +34%	100−105 −34%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +35.3%	85−90 −35.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +44.5%	110−120 −44.5%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +37.1%	170−180 −37.1%
Hitman 3	118 +38.8%	85−90 −38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +34.4%	180−190 −34.4%
Metro Exodus	144 +44%	100−105 −44%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +33.3%	90−95 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	326 +35.8%	240−250 −35.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +39%	100−105 −39%
Watch Dogs: Legion	238 +40%	170−180 −40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +35.4%	65−70 −35.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +36.5%	85−90 −36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	131 +37.9%	95−100 −37.9%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +35.3%	85−90 −35.3%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +37.1%	170−180 −37.1%
Hitman 3	110 +37.5%	80−85 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	182 +40%	130−140 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	287 +36.7%	210−220 −36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	149 +35.5%	110−120 −35.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	101 +34.7%	75−80 −34.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

131

+37.9%

95−100
−37.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	150−160 +37.3%	110−120 −37.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +37.3%	75−80 −37.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +38.2%	55−60 −38.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +38.2%	55−60 −38.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +35.5%	200−210 −35.5%
Hitman 3	112 +40%	80−85 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	151 +37.3%	110−120 −37.3%
Metro Exodus	107 +33.8%	80−85 −33.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	219 +36.9%	160−170 −36.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +36.5%	85−90 −36.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	247 +37.2%	180−190 −37.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

130

+36.8%

95−100
−36.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +43.6%	55−60 −43.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Hitman 3	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +40%	160−170 −40%
Metro Exodus	142 +42%	100−105 −42%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	115 +35.3%	85−90 −35.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	52 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +35%	80−85 −35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	135 +35%	100−105 −35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +35%	40−45 −35%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95
+35.7%

70−75

−35.7%

This is how RTX 3080 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 is 41% faster in 1080p
RTX 3080 is 34% faster in 1440p
RTX 3080 is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.40	49.19
Recency	1 September 2020	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 3080 has a 33% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 178.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.