ATI FirePro V8700 vs GeForce RTX 3080

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.26no data
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGA102RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)11 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8704800
Core clock speed1440 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate465.130.00
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs27240
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length285 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount10 GB1 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 11 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 151 Watt

RTX 3080 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V8700, on the other hand, has 111.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 and FirePro V8700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop card while FirePro V8700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5973 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.