Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with Quadro RTX A6000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
37.29

RTX A6000 outperforms RTX 3070 Mobile by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12738
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.47
Power efficiency22.2213.39
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512010752
Core clock speed1110 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6604.8
Floating-point processing power15.97 TFLOPS38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs80112
TMUs160336
Tensor Cores160336
Ray Tracing Cores4084

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.29
RTX A6000 58.60
+57.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
RTX A6000 22576
+57.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
RTX A6000 50957
+49.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
RTX A6000 89510
+16%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Mobile 25478
RTX A6000 27511
+8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Mobile 136558
+20.7%
RTX A6000 113167

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Mobile 510435
+3.2%
RTX A6000 494750

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
−51.7%
176
+51.7%
1440p74
−77%
131
+77%
4K45
−171%
122
+171%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data26.41
1440pno data35.49
4Kno data38.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 119
+60.8%
70−75
−60.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−11.4%
85−90
+11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+26.4%
70−75
−26.4%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−10.8%
130−140
+10.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−10.5%
80−85
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+44.6%
70−75
−44.6%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−9.9%
85−90
+9.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−9.7%
100−110
+9.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−5.9%
190−200
+5.9%
Hitman 3 114
+28.1%
85−90
−28.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−8.9%
170−180
+8.9%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−8.3%
130−140
+8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−8%
95−100
+8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−14.1%
150−160
+14.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−4.8%
130−140
+4.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 188
+114%
85−90
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+5.6%
70−75
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−10.8%
130−140
+10.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−10.5%
80−85
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+18.9%
70−75
−18.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−9.9%
85−90
+9.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−9.7%
100−110
+9.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−5.9%
190−200
+5.9%
Hitman 3 106
+19.1%
85−90
−19.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−8.9%
170−180
+8.9%
Metro Exodus 143
+9.2%
130−140
−9.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 81
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
−60.1%
293
+60.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−11.7%
85−90
+11.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 181
+37.1%
130−140
−37.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−11.4%
85−90
+11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−5.9%
70−75
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−10.5%
80−85
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−9.9%
85−90
+9.9%
Forza Horizon 4 167
−18%
190−200
+18%
Hitman 3 98
+10.1%
85−90
−10.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 132
−69.7%
224
+69.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 168
−71.4%
288
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
−91.5%
180
+91.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−120%
130−140
+120%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−14.1%
80−85
+14.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−12.3%
60−65
+12.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+15.2%
45−50
−15.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−11.4%
45−50
+11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−11.6%
45−50
+11.6%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−9%
230−240
+9%
Hitman 3 68
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 112
−87.5%
210
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 91
+44.4%
63
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
−97.6%
247
+97.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−17%
60−65
+17%
Watch Dogs: Legion 159
−24.5%
190−200
+24.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−13.5%
40−45
+13.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Hitman 3 38
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 119
−58%
180−190
+58%
Metro Exodus 71
+31.5%
50−55
−31.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−128%
146
+128%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+60.3%
55−60
−60.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
−110%
149
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+18.9%
35−40
−18.9%

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 77% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 171% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 114% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A6000 is 128% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is ahead in 23 tests (32%)
  • RTX A6000 is ahead in 48 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.29 58.60
Recency 12 January 2021 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 3070 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 months, and 140% lower power consumption.

RTX A6000, on the other hand, has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1910 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.