Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Place in the ranking	32	33
Place by popularity	92	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	52.67	no data
Power efficiency	14.45	22.69
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6144	4608
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2090 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	339.8	601.9
Floating-point processing power	21.75 TFLOPS	38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	192
TMUs	192	288
Tensor Cores	192	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1188 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	608.3 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti 61.12
+2.6%

RX 7900M 59.57

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti 23553
+2.6%

RX 7900M 22956

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Ti 49760

RX 7900M 59943
+20.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Ti 37663

RX 7900M 50241
+33.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	177 +6%	167 −6%
1440p	95 −26.3%	120 +26.3%
4K	61 −62.3%	99 +62.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.38	no data
1440p	6.31	no data
4K	9.82	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

174
+8.8%

160−170

−8.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	171 +43.7%	110−120 −43.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +8%	100−105 −8%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +7.1%	180−190 −7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +4.6%	100−110 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	138 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +7.2%	130−140 −7.2%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +1.8%	220−230 −1.8%
Hitman 3	120−130 +4.2%	110−120 −4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +5%	210−220 −5%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +1.3%	150−160 −1.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +2.6%	110−120 −2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +8.7%	220−230 −8.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +6.7%	110−120 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +8%	100−105 −8%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +7.1%	180−190 −7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +4.6%	100−110 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	121 +10%	110−120 −10%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +7.2%	130−140 −7.2%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +1.8%	220−230 −1.8%
Hitman 3	120−130 +4.2%	110−120 −4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +5%	210−220 −5%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +1.3%	150−160 −1.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +2.6%	110−120 −2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	316 +38%	220−230 −38%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +8.4%	110−120 −8.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	103 −15.5%	110−120 +15.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +8%	100−105 −8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +4.6%	100−110 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	111 +11%	100−105 −11%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +1.8%	220−230 −1.8%
Hitman 3	120−130 +4.2%	110−120 −4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	243 +11.5%	210−220 −11.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	274 −25.5%	344 +25.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 −14.3%	168 +14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	108 −36.1%	140−150 +36.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120
+2.6%

110−120

−2.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +10.6%	120−130 −10.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +7.9%	85−90 −7.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	93 +43.1%	65−70 −43.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +8.7%	65−70 −8.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +5.9%	65−70 −5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +6%	65−70 −6%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0.4%	270−280 −0.4%
Hitman 3	85−90 +8.6%	80−85 −8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	184 +35.3%	130−140 −35.3%
Metro Exodus	135 +35%	100−105 −35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	205 −21.5%	249 +21.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +9.4%	95−100 −9.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	230−240 +1.7%	220−230 −1.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110
+6.1%

95−100

−6.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +10.9%	60−65 −10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +9.3%	50−55 −9.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 +8.3%	45−50 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +1.8%	210−220 −1.8%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +9.6%	80−85 −9.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 −6.4%	116 +6.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +31.8%	40−45 −31.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +9.5%	40−45 −9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +7.3%	40−45 −7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +10.5%	35−40 −10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +10.2%	85−90 −10.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 −10.1%	131 +10.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 +39.4%	30−35 −39.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+10.7%

55−60

−10.7%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti is 6% faster in 1080p
RX 7900M is 26% faster in 1440p
RX 7900M is 62% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 44% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
RX 7900M is ahead in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	61.12	59.57
Recency	31 May 2021	19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	180 Watt

RTX 3070 Ti has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 61.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and Radeon RX 7900M.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.