Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.07 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | GA104 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 July 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1290 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 206.4 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 13.21 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80 | 16 |
| TMUs | 160 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 160 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 6 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 55 Watt |
RTX 3070 Max-Q has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
R7 350, on the other hand, has 45.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and Radeon R7 350. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
