Matrox Marvel G200 vs GeForce RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation72.90no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameAmpere GA106Eclipse
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1998 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1320 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,250 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate199.00.08
Floating-point processing power12.74 gflopsno data
ROPs481
TMUs1121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 2x
Length242 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed15000 MHz112 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s896.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 350 nm

RTX 3060 has a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 and Matrox Marvel G200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
Matrox Marvel G200
Marvel G200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 26946 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Matrox Marvel G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.