Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with Radeon 660M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060 Ti
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
53.13
+226%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms 660M by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49332
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.05no data
Power efficiency18.2027.94
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864384
Core clock speed1410 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate253.145.60
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs8016
TMUs15224
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores386

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 53.13
+226%
Radeon 660M 16.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Ti 20469
+226%
Radeon 660M 6285

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 Ti 37941
+463%
Radeon 660M 6743

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 Ti 78597
+238%
Radeon 660M 23222

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 Ti 28145
+481%
Radeon 660M 4848

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 Ti 153968
+389%
Radeon 660M 31515

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 Ti 615311
+117%
Radeon 660M 283076

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD141
+464%
25
−464%
1440p78
+271%
21−24
−271%
4K48
+243%
14−16
−243%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.83no data
1440p5.12no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83
+246%
24
−246%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121
+426%
21−24
−426%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+265%
26
−265%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+463%
30−33
−463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+415%
20−22
−415%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+305%
20
−305%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+357%
21−24
−357%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+378%
27−30
−378%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+235%
65−70
−235%
Hitman 3 110−120
+433%
21
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+281%
50−55
−281%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+381%
30−35
−381%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+307%
27−30
−307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
+553%
30−35
−553%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+132%
60−65
−132%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 196
+752%
21−24
−752%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+326%
19
−326%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+463%
30−33
−463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+415%
20−22
−415%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+457%
14
−457%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+357%
21−24
−357%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+378%
27−30
−378%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+235%
65−70
−235%
Hitman 3 110−120
+433%
21
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+281%
50−55
−281%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+381%
30−35
−381%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+307%
27−30
−307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 192
+482%
33
−482%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+323%
24−27
−323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+132%
60−65
−132%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+226%
21−24
−226%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+429%
14−16
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+415%
20−22
−415%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+413%
14−16
−413%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+357%
21−24
−357%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+166%
65−70
−166%
Hitman 3 110−120
+489%
18−20
−489%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+536%
22
−536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
+544%
27
−544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+513%
15
−513%
Watch Dogs: Legion 77
+24.2%
60−65
−24.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+307%
27−30
−307%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+479%
18−20
−479%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+447%
14−16
−447%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+550%
10−11
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+900%
6−7
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+464%
10−12
−464%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+516%
40−45
−516%
Hitman 3 70−75
+469%
12−14
−469%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
+470%
20−22
−470%
Metro Exodus 93
+564%
14−16
−564%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
+1058%
12−14
−1058%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+867%
9−10
−867%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
+298%
60−65
−298%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+469%
16−18
−469%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+544%
9−10
−544%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Hitman 3 57
+850%
6−7
−850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+417%
40−45
−417%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+1000%
7−8
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+650%
6−7
−650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40
+900%
4−5
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+758%
12−14
−758%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%

This is how RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 464% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 271% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 243% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3060 Ti surpassed Radeon 660M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.13 16.31
Recency 1 December 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has a 225.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15530 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 324 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.