Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency21.83no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA107DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed712 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1057 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate67.65166.4
Floating-point processing power4.329 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs64128
Tensor Cores64256
Ray Tracing Cores1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has 26.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 4438 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.