Tegra X1 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking222not rated
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Power efficiency28.23no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GM20B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048256
Core clock speed1238 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data16.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.512 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra X1, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Tegra X1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Tegra X1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Tegra X1
Tegra X1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1235 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 137 votes

Rate Tegra X1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.