Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking214not rated
Place by popularity52not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speed1238 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data291.4
Floating-point performanceno data9.326 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1101 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.