RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Place in the ranking	229	95
Place by popularity	52	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.17	25.11
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GN20-P0	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4608
Core clock speed	1238 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

large

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	16000 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_2

12 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 24.55

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 41.92
+70.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411
+87.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908
+75%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612
+26.6%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 4497

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 8351
+85.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 −56.3%	100−110 +56.3%
1440p	45 −66.7%	75−80 +66.7%
4K	29 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 −66.7%	110−120 +66.7%
Elden Ring	51 −66.7%	85−90 +66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −60%	120−130 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	38 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −63%	75−80 +63%
Forza Horizon 4	115 −65.2%	190−200 +65.2%
Metro Exodus	83 −68.7%	140−150 +68.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	87 −60.9%	140−150 +60.9%
Valorant	133 −65.4%	220−230 +65.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −60%	120−130 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	30 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%
Dota 2	96 −66.7%	160−170 +66.7%
Elden Ring	86 −62.8%	140−150 +62.8%
Far Cry 5	73 −64.4%	120−130 +64.4%
Fortnite	120−130 −69.4%	210−220 +69.4%
Forza Horizon 4	94 −70.2%	160−170 +70.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 −62.8%	140−150 +62.8%
Metro Exodus	57 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −67.7%	260−270 +67.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −66.7%	90−95 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −64.6%	130−140 +64.6%
Valorant	68 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
World of Tanks	250−260 −56.3%	400−450 +56.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −60%	120−130 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −66.7%	75−80 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Dota 2	112 −69.6%	190−200 +69.6%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −57.9%	120−130 +57.9%
Forza Horizon 4	81 −60.5%	130−140 +60.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −67.7%	260−270 +67.7%
Valorant	95−100 −61.6%	160−170 +61.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	48 −66.7%	80−85 +66.7%
Elden Ring	40−45 −62.8%	70−75 +62.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	48 −66.7%	80−85 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −65.7%	290−300 +65.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
World of Tanks	160−170 −65.6%	270−280 +65.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −63.3%	80−85 +63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −69%	120−130 +69%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
Metro Exodus	52 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
Valorant	65−70 −66.7%	110−120 +66.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Dota 2	44 −70.5%	75−80 +70.5%
Elden Ring	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	44 −70.5%	75−80 +70.5%
Metro Exodus	17 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −60%	120−130 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 −70.5%	75−80 +70.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −60%	8−9 +60%
Dota 2	62 −61.3%	100−105 +61.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Fortnite	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	34 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Valorant	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 56% faster in 1080p
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 55% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.55	41.92
Recency	11 May 2021	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has 91.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 70.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.