GeForce 9800M GT vs RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Place in the ranking	232	1113
Place by popularity	56	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.13	1.04
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GN20-P0	G92
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	96
Core clock speed	1238 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.24 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	360
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	51.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	no data	4.0
OpenGL	no data	3.3
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 22.90
+2389%

9800M GT 0.92

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+977%

9800M GT 4011

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 +3050%	2−3 −3050%
1440p	45 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
4K	29 +2800%	1−2 −2800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +500%	7−8 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +1550%	4−5 −1550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +2400%	3−4 −2400%
Counter-Strike 2	40 +471%	7−8 −471%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	115 +1338%	8−9 −1338%
Forza Horizon 5	80 +2567%	3−4 −2567%
Metro Exodus	83 +2667%	3−4 −2667%
Red Dead Redemption 2	87 +1350%	6−7 −1350%
Valorant	133 +2560%	5−6 −2560%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +2400%	3−4 −2400%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +329%	7−8 −329%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 +825%	4−5 −825%
Dota 2	96 +3100%	3−4 −3100%
Far Cry 5	73 +630%	10−11 −630%
Fortnite	120−130 +4033%	3−4 −4033%
Forza Horizon 4	94 +1075%	8−9 −1075%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +3150%	2−3 −3150%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 +2767%	3−4 −2767%
Metro Exodus	57 +2750%	2−3 −2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +1192%	12−14 −1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +800%	6−7 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +1217%	6−7 −1217%
Valorant	68 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
World of Tanks	250−260 +1013%	21−24 −1013%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +2400%	3−4 −2400%
Counter-Strike 2	26 +271%	7−8 −271%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Dota 2	112 +2700%	4−5 −2700%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +650%	10−11 −650%
Forza Horizon 4	81 +913%	8−9 −913%
Forza Horizon 5	55 +2650%	2−3 −2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +1192%	12−14 −1192%
Valorant	95−100 +3167%	3−4 −3167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	48 +4700%	1−2 −4700%
Grand Theft Auto V	48 +4700%	1−2 −4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +3400%	5−6 −3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24	0−1
World of Tanks	160−170 +3160%	5−6 −3160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +467%	3−4 −467%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +1320%	5−6 −1320%
Forza Horizon 4	56 +2700%	2−3 −2700%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Metro Exodus	52 +2500%	2−3 −2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +800%	4−5 −800%
Valorant	65−70 +1000%	6−7 −1000%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Dota 2	44 +193%	14−16 −193%
Grand Theft Auto V	44 +193%	14−16 −193%
Metro Exodus	17	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +2400%	3−4 −2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +193%	14−16 −193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	62 +313%	14−16 −313%
Far Cry 5	30−35	0−1
Fortnite	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24	0−1
Valorant	30−35 +3100%	1−2 −3100%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and 9800M GT compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 3050% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 4400% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 4033% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed 9800M GT in all 34 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.90	0.92
Recency	11 May 2021	29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	8 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	65 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 2389.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.