UHD Graphics 64EU vs GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking310not rated
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.90no data
Power efficiency13.40no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA107Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 January 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1545 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1740 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate111.440.00
Floating-point processing power7.127 TFLOPS1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 January 2022 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 3050 4 GB has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and UHD Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 64EU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 64EU
UHD Graphics 64EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2593 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.