GMA X3100 vs GeForce RTX 2080

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.57no data
Power efficiency15.80no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameTU104Broadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2944no data
Core clock speed1515 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate314.64.000
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs1848
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 September 2018 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 13 Watt

RTX 2080 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3100, on the other hand, has 1553.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 and GMA X3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop card while GMA X3100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080
Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2171 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 57 votes

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.