Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
39.33

RX 7800 XT outperforms RTX 2080 Mobile by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11230
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.02
Power efficiency17.9716.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104BNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29443840
Core clock speed1380 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate292.6583.2
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs184240
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores4660

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Mobile 39.33
RX 7800 XT 63.15
+60.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Mobile 34897
RX 7800 XT 65611
+88%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2080 Mobile 68525
RX 7800 XT 134322
+96%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Mobile 25436
RX 7800 XT 49707
+95.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Mobile 139346
RX 7800 XT 202773
+45.5%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Mobile 458810
RX 7800 XT 745990
+62.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
−52.1%
216
+52.1%
1440p95
−28.4%
122
+28.4%
4K60
−16.7%
70
+16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.31
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−274%
258
+274%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90
−97.8%
178
+97.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−155%
222
+155%
Battlefield 5 155
−28.4%
190−200
+28.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+3.5%
110−120
−3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−180%
193
+180%
Far Cry 5 144
+27.4%
110−120
−27.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 159
+5.3%
150−160
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 386
+67.8%
230−240
−67.8%
Hitman 3 126
+1.6%
120−130
−1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 276
+18.5%
230−240
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+3.4%
110−120
−3.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210
−21.9%
250−260
+21.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 279
+86%
150−160
−86%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 145
−80%
261
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
−145%
181
+145%
Battlefield 5 146
−36.3%
190−200
+36.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110
−3.6%
110−120
+3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−133%
161
+133%
Far Cry 5 116
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 116
−30.2%
150−160
+30.2%
Forza Horizon 4 298
+29.6%
230−240
−29.6%
Hitman 3 122
−1.6%
120−130
+1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 266
+14.2%
230−240
−14.2%
Metro Exodus 144
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 104
−13.5%
110−120
+13.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−178%
398
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−63%
130−140
+63%
Watch Dogs: Legion 274
+82.7%
150−160
−82.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
−94%
130
+94%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
−139%
158
+139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
−39%
110−120
+39%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−114%
148
+114%
Far Cry 5 84
−34.5%
110−120
+34.5%
Forza Horizon 4 139
−59.7%
222
+59.7%
Hitman 3 102
−21.6%
120−130
+21.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 139
−97.1%
274
+97.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−138%
340
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
−111%
200
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−104%
145
+104%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 112
−5.4%
110−120
+5.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108
−29.6%
140−150
+29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 81
−21%
95−100
+21%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
−116%
119
+116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
−138%
124
+138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
−21.3%
70−75
+21.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−213%
97
+213%
Far Cry 5 67
−9%
70−75
+9%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+3.3%
270−280
−3.3%
Hitman 3 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 117
−85.5%
217
+85.5%
Metro Exodus 89
−66.3%
148
+66.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−156%
243
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−158%
147
+158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 264
+12.3%
230−240
−12.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98
−7.1%
100−110
+7.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55
−32.7%
70−75
+32.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
−27.1%
60−65
+27.1%
Hitman 3 42
−28.6%
50−55
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
−85.8%
220−230
+85.8%
Metro Exodus 75
−25.3%
90−95
+25.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−81.5%
118
+81.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
−134%
89
+134%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34
−112%
72
+112%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−238%
44
+238%
Far Cry 5 35
−22.9%
40−45
+22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 82
−100%
164
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−145%
130
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 31
−116%
67
+116%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
−23.1%
60−65
+23.1%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 52% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 28% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Mobile is 86% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 274% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Mobile is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 58 tests (81%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.33 63.15
Recency 29 January 2019 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 263 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has 75.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 60.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 146 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2966 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.