ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and Mobility Radeon HD 3850, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
39.51
+5710%

RTX 2080 Mobile outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3850 by a whopping 5710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1101183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RV6xx (2007−2010)
GPU code nameN18E-G3 TU104M88
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 December 2007 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2944320
Core clock speed1380 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate292.69.280
Floating-point performance9.362 gflops0.3712 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Mobile 39.51
+5710%
ATI Mobility HD 3850 0.68

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2080 Mobile 68525
+3546%
ATI Mobility HD 3850 1880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD144
+7100%
2−3
−7100%
1440p94
+9300%
1−2
−9300%
4K65
+6400%
1−2
−6400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Battlefield 5 155
+7650%
2−3
−7650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Far Cry 5 144
+7100%
2−3
−7100%
Far Cry New Dawn 159
+15800%
1−2
−15800%
Forza Horizon 4 386
+6333%
6−7
−6333%
Hitman 3 126
+2420%
5−6
−2420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 276
+2409%
10−12
−2409%
Metro Exodus 144
+7100%
2−3
−7100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210
+3400%
6−7
−3400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 279
+830%
30−33
−830%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 145
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
Battlefield 5 146
+7200%
2−3
−7200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110
+3567%
3−4
−3567%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Far Cry 5 116
+11500%
1−2
−11500%
Far Cry New Dawn 116
+11500%
1−2
−11500%
Forza Horizon 4 298
+5860%
5−6
−5860%
Hitman 3 122
+2340%
5−6
−2340%
Horizon Zero Dawn 266
+2318%
10−12
−2318%
Metro Exodus 144
+7100%
2−3
−7100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 104 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+2283%
6−7
−2283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Watch Dogs: Legion 274
+813%
30−33
−813%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Far Cry 5 84
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
Forza Horizon 4 139
+6850%
2−3
−6850%
Hitman 3 102
+1940%
5−6
−1940%
Horizon Zero Dawn 139
+1164%
10−12
−1164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+2283%
6−7
−2283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+850%
10−11
−850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+137%
30−33
−137%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 112 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+10700%
1−2
−10700%
Far Cry New Dawn 81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry 5 67
+6600%
1−2
−6600%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+6900%
4−5
−6900%
Hitman 3 72
+1100%
6−7
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 117
+3800%
3−4
−3800%
Metro Exodus 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 264
+13100%
2−3
−13100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+3167%
3−4
−3167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 48 0−1
Hitman 3 42 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Metro Exodus 75
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+6400%
1−2
−6400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 82
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 31 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and ATI Mobility HD 3850 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 7100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 9300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 6400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Mobile is 15800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Mobile surpassed ATI Mobility HD 3850 in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.51 0.68
Recency 6 January 2019 1 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 55 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has a 5710.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3850, on the other hand, has 172.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Mobility Radeon HD 3850

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 143 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.