Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Place in the ranking	56	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	31.94	no data
Power efficiency	13.92	22.69
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2019 (5 years ago)	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	4608
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz	2090 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	348.5	601.9
Floating-point processing power	11.15 TFLOPS	38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	192
TMUs	192	288
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1937 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	495.9 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super 50.76

RX 7900M 59.57
+17.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Super 19558

RX 7900M 22956
+17.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Super 40963

RX 7900M 59943
+46.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Super 27398

RX 7900M 50241
+83.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140 −19.3%	167 +19.3%
1440p	97 −23.7%	120 +23.7%
4K	68 −45.6%	99 +45.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.99	no data
1440p	7.21	no data
4K	10.28	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

90−95
−7.5%

100−105

+7.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 −20.2%	110−120 +20.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	94 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Battlefield 5	194 +6.6%	180−190 −6.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	127 +17.6%	100−110 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Far Cry 5	141 +29.4%	100−110 −29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	170 +23.2%	130−140 −23.2%
Forza Horizon 4	266 +18.8%	220−230 −18.8%
Hitman 3	113 −4.4%	110−120 +4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	301 +38.1%	210−220 −38.1%
Metro Exodus	144 −6.3%	150−160 +6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +7%	110−120 −7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	198 −15.7%	220−230 +15.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 +54.4%	140−150 −54.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	142 +19.3%	110−120 −19.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 −26.6%	100−105 +26.6%
Battlefield 5	182 +0%	180−190 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120 +11.1%	100−110 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Far Cry 5	112 +2.8%	100−110 −2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	128 −7.8%	130−140 +7.8%
Forza Horizon 4	258 +15.2%	220−230 −15.2%
Hitman 3	116 −1.7%	110−120 +1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	283 +29.8%	210−220 −29.8%
Metro Exodus	144 −6.3%	150−160 +6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 −14%	110−120 +14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	225 −1.8%	220−230 +1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −13.3%	110−120 +13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 +43.5%	140−150 −43.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 −75%	110−120 +75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90 −20%	100−110 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	89 −12.4%	100−105 +12.4%
Far Cry 5	79 −38%	100−110 +38%
Forza Horizon 4	133 −68.4%	220−230 +68.4%
Hitman 3	108 −9.3%	110−120 +9.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	162 −34.6%	210−220 +34.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	189 −82%	344 +82%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 −54.1%	168 +54.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75 −96%	140−150 +96%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

118
+3.5%

110−120

−3.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	134 +8.9%	120−130 −8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +4.5%	85−90 −4.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	57 −21.1%	65−70 +21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65 −4.6%	65−70 +4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 −14%	65−70 +14%
Far Cry 5	70 +4.5%	65−70 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	249 −8.4%	270−280 +8.4%
Hitman 3	79 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	127 −7.1%	130−140 +7.1%
Metro Exodus	90 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	141 −76.6%	249 +76.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −18.5%	95−100 +18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 −8.5%	220−230 +8.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

107
+9.2%

95−100

−9.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	62 −3.2%	60−65 +3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	53 −1.9%	50−55 +1.9%
Hitman 3	40−45 −14.3%	45−50 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	131 −66.4%	210−220 +66.4%
Metro Exodus	89 +7.2%	80−85 −7.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 −46.8%	116 +46.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 −7.3%	40−45 +7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	36 −16.7%	40−45 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	39 −5.1%	40−45 +5.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Far Cry 5	40 +5.3%	35−40 −5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	81 −8.6%	85−90 +8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	82 −59.8%	131 +59.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	34 +3%	30−35 −3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60
+7.1%

55−60

−7.1%

This is how RTX 2080 Super and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

RX 7900M is 19% faster in 1080p
RX 7900M is 24% faster in 1440p
RX 7900M is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 54% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 96% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super is ahead in 23 tests (35%)
RX 7900M is ahead in 42 tests (64%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	50.76	59.57
Recency	23 July 2019	19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	180 Watt

RX 7900M has a 17.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.