Radeon RX 7600 XT vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Place in the ranking	139	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	76.83
Power efficiency	30.81	16.18
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2048
Core clock speed	735 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1080 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	207.4	352.6
Floating-point processing power	6.636 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	192	128
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	352.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 35.80

RX 7600 XT 44.66
+24.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 13762

RX 7600 XT 17169
+24.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	109 −19.3%	130−140 +19.3%
1440p	73 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
4K	49 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.53
1440p	no data	3.66
4K	no data	5.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Elden Ring	120−130 −21%	150−160 +21%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	87 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −23.5%	210−220 +23.5%
Metro Exodus	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 −20%	120−130 +20%
Valorant	168 −19%	200−210 +19%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −21.2%	120−130 +21.2%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Dota 2	121 −24%	150−160 +24%
Elden Ring	120−130 −21%	150−160 +21%
Far Cry 5	82 −22%	100−105 +22%
Fortnite	160−170 −24.2%	200−210 +24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −23.5%	210−220 +23.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 −16.7%	140−150 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	78 −21.8%	95−100 +21.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −24.4%	240−250 +24.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −21%	150−160 +21%
Valorant	102 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7.5%	300−310 +7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	77 −23.4%	95−100 +23.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Dota 2	118 −18.6%	140−150 +18.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −18.3%	110−120 +18.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −23.5%	210−220 +23.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −24.4%	240−250 +24.4%
Valorant	154 −23.4%	190−200 +23.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 −23.1%	80−85 +23.1%
Elden Ring	70−75 −19.7%	85−90 +19.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −23.1%	80−85 +23.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −20%	210−220 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
World of Tanks	220−230 −22.8%	280−290 +22.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	76 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −22.8%	140−150 +22.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −18.8%	120−130 +18.8%
Metro Exodus	75 −20%	90−95 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Valorant	117 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Dota 2	72 −18.1%	85−90 +18.1%
Elden Ring	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	72 −18.1%	85−90 +18.1%
Metro Exodus	32 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −22.8%	140−150 +22.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 −18.1%	85−90 +18.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	46 −19.6%	55−60 +19.6%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Dota 2	102 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −17.6%	60−65 +17.6%
Fortnite	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −20.7%	70−75 +20.7%
Valorant	64 −17.2%	75−80 +17.2%

This is how RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 19% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 XT is 23% faster in 1440p
RX 7600 XT is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.80	44.66
Recency	2 April 2020	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	190 Watt

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q has 137.5% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 24.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.