RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	136	141
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	90.94
Power efficiency	31.10	35.03
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104B	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)	23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2944	3328
Core clock speed	735 MHz	562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1095 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	201.5	124.8
Floating-point processing power	6.447 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	184	104
Tensor Cores	368	104
Ray Tracing Cores	46	26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Max-Q 36.14
+1.5%

RTX A2000 12 GB 35.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Max-Q 13894
+1.5%

RTX A2000 12 GB 13694

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
1440p	77 +2.7%	75−80 −2.7%
4K	53 +6%	50−55 −6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.08
1440p	no data	5.99
4K	no data	8.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Elden Ring	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +7.5%	160−170 −7.5%
Metro Exodus	95 +5.6%	90−95 −5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95 +5.6%	90−95 −5.6%
Valorant	140 +7.7%	130−140 −7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	132 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Dota 2	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Elden Ring	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%
Far Cry 5	71 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%
Fortnite	160−170 +8%	150−160 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +7.5%	160−170 −7.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	100 +5.3%	95−100 −5.3%
Metro Exodus	75 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	241 +4.8%	230−240 −4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	59 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +5%	120−130 −5%
Valorant	121 +10%	110−120 −10%
World of Tanks	270−280 +3.3%	270−280 −3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	68 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Dota 2	120 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +7.5%	160−170 −7.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Valorant	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Elden Ring	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
World of Tanks	230−240 +4.5%	220−230 −4.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +5.5%	110−120 −5.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +2%	100−105 −2%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Valorant	110−120 +10%	100−105 −10%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Dota 2	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Elden Ring	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Metro Exodus	21 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	118 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Dota 2	65−70 +6.2%	65−70 −6.2%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Fortnite	51 +2%	50−55 −2%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Valorant	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%

This is how RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Max-Q is 5% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Max-Q is 3% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Max-Q is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.14	35.62
Recency	29 January 2019	23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2080 Max-Q has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX A2000 12 GB.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.