Radeon 880M vs GeForce RTX 2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 with Radeon 880M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
41.97
+107%

RTX 2070 outperforms 880M by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.37no data
Power efficiency16.5192.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTU106Strix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 October 2018 (6 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304512
Core clock speed1410 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate233.392.80
Floating-point processing power7.465 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14432
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 41.97
+107%
Radeon 880M 20.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 16134
+107%
Radeon 880M 7778

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 31260
+125%
Radeon 880M 13892

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 23186
+177%
Radeon 880M 8371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 127652
+147%
Radeon 880M 51662

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129
+258%
36
−258%
1440p88
+300%
22
−300%
4K62
+130%
27−30
−130%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.87no data
1440p5.67no data
4K8.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+112%
42
−112%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+128%
40−45
−128%
Elden Ring 140−150
+133%
60−65
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+40.6%
60−65
−40.6%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+170%
33
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+180%
74
−180%
Metro Exodus 103
+90.7%
50−55
−90.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+139%
45−50
−139%
Valorant 208
+154%
80−85
−154%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160
+150%
60−65
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+256%
25
−256%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Dota 2 130
+145%
53
−145%
Elden Ring 140−150
+133%
60−65
−133%
Far Cry 5 93
+111%
44
−111%
Fortnite 166
+55.1%
100−110
−55.1%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+229%
63
−229%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+144%
52
−144%
Metro Exodus 80
+48.1%
50−55
−48.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 245
+81.5%
130−140
−81.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+136%
60−65
−136%
Valorant 125
+52.4%
80−85
−52.4%
World of Tanks 270−280
+19.7%
230−240
−19.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+23.4%
60−65
−23.4%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+324%
21
−324%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+129%
14−16
−129%
Dota 2 130
+117%
60−65
−117%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+291%
53
−291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Valorant 184
+124%
80−85
−124%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 75−80
+259%
22
−259%
Elden Ring 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+147%
30−35
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
World of Tanks 260−270
+93.4%
130−140
−93.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+85.4%
40−45
−85.4%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+126%
19
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+145%
55−60
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+137%
50−55
−137%
Metro Exodus 82
+78.3%
45−50
−78.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
Valorant 127
+144%
50−55
−144%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+159%
16−18
−159%
Dota 2 86
+153%
30−35
−153%
Elden Ring 40−45
+180%
14−16
−180%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+153%
30−35
−153%
Metro Exodus 32
+113%
14−16
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 128
+110%
60−65
−110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+108%
12−14
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+153%
30−35
−153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+140%
20−22
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+159%
16−18
−159%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 116
+111%
55−60
−111%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+146%
24−27
−146%
Fortnite 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+133%
30−33
−133%
Valorant 68
+183%
24−27
−183%

This is how RTX 2070 and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is 258% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 is 300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 is 130% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 is 324% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 880M is 2% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is ahead in 53 tests (98%)
  • Radeon 880M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.97 20.23
Recency 17 October 2018 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2070 has a 107.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 880M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop card while Radeon 880M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3668 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.