RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2070

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
41.85

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2070 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9472
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.5581.28
Power efficiency16.6745.72
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 October 2018 (6 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 142% better value for money than RTX 2070.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
Core clock speed1410 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate233.3187.4
Floating-point processing power7.465 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14488
Tensor Cores28888
Ray Tracing Cores3622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 41.85
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.92
+9.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 16146
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17715
+9.7%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 87875
+0.8%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 87210

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 83789
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 84566
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%
1440p86
−4.7%
90−95
+4.7%
4K60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.904.64
1440p5.807.21
4K8.329.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−9.2%
95−100
+9.2%
Battlefield 5 164
−3.7%
170−180
+3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 124
−4.8%
130−140
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 148
−8.1%
160−170
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 246
−5.7%
260−270
+5.7%
Hitman 3 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 258
−8.5%
280−290
+8.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 207
−6.3%
220−230
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
−6.3%
270−280
+6.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Battlefield 5 156
−9%
170−180
+9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 101
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 227
−5.7%
240−250
+5.7%
Hitman 3 113
−6.2%
120−130
+6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
−8.9%
270−280
+8.9%
Metro Exodus 144
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
−9.7%
170−180
+9.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−4.7%
90−95
+4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
−6.6%
260−270
+6.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78
−9%
85−90
+9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 79
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Hitman 3 94
−6.4%
100−105
+6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 139
−7.9%
150−160
+7.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
−9.7%
170−180
+9.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
−9.2%
95−100
+9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 99
−1%
100−105
+1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 215
−7%
230−240
+7%
Hitman 3 64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%
Metro Exodus 82
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240
−8.3%
260−270
+8.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Hitman 3 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 76
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 63
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

This is how RTX 2070 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.85 45.92
Recency 17 October 2018 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2070 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3521 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.