T400 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Place in performance ranking	61	429
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.60	8.61
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Turing TU104	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$261 (0.5x MSRP)	$216

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 441% better value for money than T400 4 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	384
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	283.2	34.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.26
+390%

T400 4 GB 9.64

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms T400 4 GB by 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Super 18248
+390%

T400 4 GB 3723

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms T400 4 GB by 390% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +450%	24−27 −450%
1440p	83 +419%	16−18 −419%
4K	54 +440%	10−12 −440%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

450−500

+379%

94
−379%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	500−550 +381%	104 −381%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	400−450 +355%	88 −355%
Battlefield 5	850−900 +364%	183 −364%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	550−600 +362%	119 −362%
Cyberpunk 2077	400−450 +376%	84 −376%
Far Cry 5	700−750 +370%	149 −370%
Far Cry New Dawn	750−800 +375%	158 −375%
Forza Horizon 4	850−900 +389%	174 −389%
Hitman 3	550−600 +374%	116 −374%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1350−1400 +384%	279 −384%
Metro Exodus	700−750 +386%	144 −386%
Red Dead Redemption 2	550−600 +351%	122 −351%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1200−1250 +376%	252 −376%
Watch Dogs: Legion	500−550 +350%	111 −350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	400−450 +344%	90 −344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	350−400 +373%	74 −373%
Battlefield 5	800−850 +365%	172 −365%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	550−600 +358%	120 −358%
Cyberpunk 2077	350−400 +349%	78 −349%
Far Cry 5	550−600 +358%	120 −358%
Far Cry New Dawn	550−600 +358%	120 −358%
Forza Horizon 4	1250−1300 +384%	258 −384%
Hitman 3	450−500 +389%	92 −389%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1300−1350 +381%	270 −381%
Metro Exodus	600−650 +376%	126 −376%
Red Dead Redemption 2	550−600 +355%	121 −355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	950−1000 +380%	198 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	850−900 +370%	181 −370%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1050−1100 +388%	215 −388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	300−310 +362%	65 −362%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +355%	66 −355%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	400−450 +340%	91 −340%
Cyberpunk 2077	350−400 +379%	73 −379%
Far Cry 5	400−450 +382%	83 −382%
Forza Horizon 4	750−800 +390%	153 −390%
Horizon Zero Dawn	750−800 +381%	156 −381%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	800−850 +379%	167 −379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	450−500 +350%	100 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +341%	68 −341%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

550−600
+382%

114

−382%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	550−600 +366%	118 −366%
Far Cry New Dawn	600−650 +355%	132 −355%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +374%	57 −374%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	250−260 +372%	53 −372%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	350−400 +332%	81 −332%
Cyberpunk 2077	230−240 +389%	47 −389%
Far Cry 5	450−500 +359%	98 −359%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +380%	125 −380%
Hitman 3	300−310 +323%	71 −323%
Horizon Zero Dawn	550−600 +366%	118 −366%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +340%	91 −340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	600−650 +388%	123 −388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +373%	70−75 −373%
Watch Dogs: Legion	250−260 +390%	51 −390%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

450−500

+374%

95
−374%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	260−270 +373%	55 −373%
Far Cry New Dawn	230−240 +379%	48 −379%
Hitman 3	200−210 +376%	42 −376%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +376%	60−65 −376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +378%	46 −378%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 +341%	68 −341%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	190−200 +387%	39 −387%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +369%	32 −369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +377%	44 −377%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +378%	23 −378%
Far Cry 5	170−180 +386%	35 −386%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +376%	84 −376%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +335%	69 −335%
Metro Exodus	270−280 +374%	57 −374%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +383%	29 −383%