GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs RTX 2070 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
30.24
+15.1%

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking181205
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Power efficiency27.2725.28
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106BGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed885 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1185 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate170.682.80
Floating-point processing power5.46 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14480
Tensor Cores28880
Ray Tracing Cores3620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.24
+15.1%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 11668
+15.1%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10141

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 22089
+22.3%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 17335
+29.8%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 106564
+46.1%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 413114
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 422757
+2.3%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2070 Max-Q 6661
+28.8%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 5170

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+28%
75
−28%
1440p56
+30.2%
43
−30.2%
4K40
+48.1%
27
−48.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−21.6%
62
+21.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+21.7%
60
−21.7%
Battlefield 5 110
+34.1%
80−85
−34.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+21.6%
50−55
−21.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−15.7%
59
+15.7%
Far Cry 5 85
+46.6%
55−60
−46.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%
Forza Horizon 4 204
+39.7%
140−150
−39.7%
Hitman 3 81
+1.3%
80
−1.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+16.5%
110−120
−16.5%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−28.9%
98
+28.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+74.1%
85−90
−74.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−103%
231
+103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 118
+115%
55−60
−115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+74.3%
35
−74.3%
Battlefield 5 100
+22%
80−85
−22%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+45.1%
50−55
−45.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+13.3%
45
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 68
+17.2%
55−60
−17.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Forza Horizon 4 191
+30.8%
140−150
−30.8%
Hitman 3 81
+5.2%
77
−5.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+16.5%
110−120
−16.5%
Metro Exodus 120
+5.3%
114
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85
+9%
78
−9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+1%
105
−1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+18.5%
50−55
−18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−78.1%
203
+78.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
−10%
55−60
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+108%
26
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
+11.8%
50−55
−11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+27.5%
40
−27.5%
Far Cry 5 52
−11.5%
55−60
+11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 98
−49%
140−150
+49%
Hitman 3 72
+7.5%
67
−7.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+14.1%
92
−14.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+17.8%
90
−17.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+28%
50
−28%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+82.1%
28
−82.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+3.7%
81
−3.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+29.8%
45−50
−29.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+19.2%
26
−19.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.8%
22
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 36
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Forza Horizon 4 176
+23.1%
140−150
−23.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
−24.3%
46
+24.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+15.9%
69
−15.9%
Metro Exodus 72
+20%
60
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+13.1%
61
−13.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+17.3%
139
−17.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−9.8%
56
+9.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+20%
24−27
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Hitman 3 24−27
+20%
20
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+18%
120−130
−18%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−30.6%
47
+30.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+55.2%
29
−55.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10
+25%
Far Cry 5 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+23.5%
30−35
−23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+14.7%
34
−14.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+40%
10
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−11.5%
29
+11.5%

This is how RTX 2070 Max-Q and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 28% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Max-Q is 115% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 103% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.24 26.28
Recency 29 January 2019 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 343 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4121 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.