Radeon R7 250E vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 670 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.27 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.46 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | TU106B | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2020 (4 years ago) | 20 December 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 162.0 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.184 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 16 |
| TMUs | 144 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 June 2020 | 20 December 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 55 Watt |
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
R7 250E, on the other hand, has 109.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh and Radeon R7 250E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon R7 250E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
