Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.68
+77.2%

RTX 2060 outperforms T2000 Mobile by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129263
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.85no data
Power efficiency15.9824.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201024
Core clock speed1365 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6114.2
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs12064
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.68
+77.2%
T2000 Mobile 20.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 14151
+77.2%
T2000 Mobile 7985

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 27163
+101%
T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+81.5%
65−70
−81.5%
1440p72
+80%
40−45
−80%
4K49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p4.85no data
4K7.12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+100%
45−50
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Battlefield 5 157
+131%
65−70
−131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+152%
40−45
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 114
+138%
45−50
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
+133%
55−60
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 205
+61.4%
120−130
−61.4%
Hitman 3 98
+139%
40−45
−139%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
+151%
95−100
−151%
Metro Exodus 144
+103%
70−75
−103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+98.2%
55−60
−98.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 191
+177%
65−70
−177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
+173%
90−95
−173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+185%
45−50
−185%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Battlefield 5 140
+106%
65−70
−106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 96
+129%
40−45
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 91
+89.6%
45−50
−89.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 95
+72.7%
55−60
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+52.8%
120−130
−52.8%
Hitman 3 96
+134%
40−45
−134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 247
+149%
95−100
−149%
Metro Exodus 140
+97.2%
70−75
−97.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+87.3%
55−60
−87.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+91.3%
65−70
−91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+65.2%
45−50
−65.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+162%
90−95
−162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+21.7%
45−50
−21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+69%
40−45
−69%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 70
+45.8%
45−50
−45.8%
Forza Horizon 4 105
−21%
120−130
+21%
Hitman 3 81
+97.6%
40−45
−97.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+21.2%
95−100
−21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+91.3%
65−70
−91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+58.7%
45−50
−58.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
−107%
90−95
+107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+75%
40−45
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+75%
30−35
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+121%
18−20
−121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+122%
21−24
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+79.3%
110−120
−79.3%
Hitman 3 54
+125%
24−27
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+112%
40−45
−112%
Metro Exodus 76
+94.9%
35−40
−94.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+102%
40−45
−102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 236
+95%
120−130
−95%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+118%
30−35
−118%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+100%
20−22
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Hitman 3 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
−2.9%
100−110
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 52
+136%
21−24
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+143%
21−24
−143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+118%
10−12
−118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 28
+155%
10−12
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 25
+127%
10−12
−127%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+111%
27−30
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+111%
18−20
−111%

This is how RTX 2060 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 82% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 80% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 81% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 is 200% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 107% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.68 20.70
Recency 7 January 2019 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2060 has a 77.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10195 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 381 vote

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.