Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and Radeon 760M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
30.45
+105%

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms 760M by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.2368.01
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Hawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920512
Core clock speed960 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate144.083.17
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs12032
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores308

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Mobile 30.45
+105%
Radeon 760M 14.82

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Mobile 21262
+121%
Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2060 Mobile 57644
+74.8%
Radeon 760M 32985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Mobile 16331
+166%
Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Mobile 99179
+137%
Radeon 760M 41767

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2060 Mobile 6141
+190%
Radeon 760M 2116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+235%
31
−235%
1440p66
+247%
19
−247%
4K42
+133%
18−21
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+136%
25
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+110%
30
−110%
Elden Ring 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+87.5%
45−50
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+211%
19
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+158%
12
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+192%
51
−192%
Metro Exodus 82
+100%
40−45
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+178%
35−40
−178%
Valorant 140
+137%
55−60
−137%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+121%
45−50
−121%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+228%
18
−228%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+167%
9
−167%
Dota 2 99
+330%
23
−330%
Elden Ring 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%
Far Cry 5 70
+141%
29
−141%
Fortnite 140−150
+73.5%
80−85
−73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+180%
44
−180%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+165%
34
−165%
Metro Exodus 61
+48.8%
40−45
−48.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 247
+131%
100−110
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+25%
35−40
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+127%
45−50
−127%
Valorant 81
+37.3%
55−60
−37.3%
World of Tanks 270−280
+42.7%
190−200
−42.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+58.3%
45−50
−58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+127%
24−27
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Dota 2 112
+111%
50−55
−111%
Far Cry 5 122
+122%
55−60
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+189%
37
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 84
−27.4%
100−110
+27.4%
Valorant 123
+108%
55−60
−108%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Elden Ring 55−60
+148%
21−24
−148%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+145%
21−24
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+33.6%
130−140
−33.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+123%
12−14
−123%
World of Tanks 190−200
+89.4%
100−110
−89.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+103%
30−33
−103%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+161%
35−40
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+133%
35−40
−133%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+116%
30−35
−116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+153%
18−20
−153%
Valorant 87
+135%
35−40
−135%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Dota 2 55−60
+112%
24−27
−112%
Elden Ring 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+112%
24−27
−112%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+123%
40−45
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+112%
24−27
−112%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+121%
14−16
−121%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 87
+235%
24−27
−235%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+121%
18−20
−121%
Fortnite 39
+129%
16−18
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Valorant 41
+156%
16−18
−156%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 235% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 247% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 330% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 38% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.45 14.82
Recency 29 January 2019 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 105.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1711 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 215 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.