CMP 40HX vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile with CMP 40HX, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
30.45
+41%

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms CMP 40HX by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.87
Power efficiency18.238.03
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106TU106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202304
Core clock speed960 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate144.0237.6
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPS7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs120144
Tensor Cores240288
Ray Tracing Cores3036

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+48.6%
70−75
−48.6%
1440p66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
4K42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.99
1440pno data15.53
4Kno data25.89

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Elden Ring 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+50%
60−65
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+49%
100−105
−49%
Metro Exodus 82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%
Valorant 140
+47.4%
95−100
−47.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Dota 2 99
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Elden Ring 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
Far Cry 5 70
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Fortnite 140−150
+44%
100−105
−44%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+44.7%
85−90
−44.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+50%
60−65
−50%
Metro Exodus 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 247
+45.3%
170−180
−45.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
Valorant 81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
World of Tanks 270−280
+44.2%
190−200
−44.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+52%
50−55
−52%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Dota 2 112
+49.3%
75−80
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 122
+43.5%
85−90
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+42.7%
75−80
−42.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 84
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Valorant 123
+44.7%
85−90
−44.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Elden Ring 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
World of Tanks 190−200
+51.5%
130−140
−51.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+44.6%
65−70
−44.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Valorant 87
+45%
60−65
−45%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Dota 2 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Elden Ring 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Fortnite 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Valorant 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and CMP 40HX compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 49% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 47% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.45 21.59
Recency 29 January 2019 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 185 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 41% higher aggregate performance score, and 60.9% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1711 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 56 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.