Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Super with Arc A370M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
36.89
+222%

RTX 2060 Super outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93396
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.49no data
Power efficiency16.6525.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU106DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores21761024
Core clock speed1470 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate224.499.20
Floating-point processing power7.181 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs13664
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores348

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2060 Super 36.89
+222%
Arc A370M 11.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Super 16485
+222%
Arc A370M 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Super 29668
+145%
Arc A370M 12090

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Super 22243
+173%
Arc A370M 8149

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Super 121804
+242%
Arc A370M 35604

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+197%
39
−197%
1440p66
+230%
20
−230%
4K43
+26.5%
34
−26.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.44no data
1440p6.05no data
4K9.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 168
+200%
56
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 320
+364%
65−70
−364%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+91.3%
46
−91.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 124
+195%
42
−195%
Battlefield 5 117
+117%
50−55
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 285
+313%
65−70
−313%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+114%
37
−114%
Far Cry 5 135
+176%
49
−176%
Fortnite 266
+269%
70−75
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 152
+187%
50−55
−187%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+221%
35−40
−221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
+227%
45−50
−227%
Valorant 298
+176%
100−110
−176%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 73
+204%
24
−204%
Battlefield 5 101
+87%
50−55
−87%
Counter-Strike 2 175
+154%
65−70
−154%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+58.9%
170−180
−58.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+184%
25
−184%
Dota 2 200
+194%
68
−194%
Far Cry 5 126
+174%
46
−174%
Fortnite 175
+143%
70−75
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+177%
50−55
−177%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+177%
35−40
−177%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+379%
29
−379%
Metro Exodus 81
+138%
34
−138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+218%
45−50
−218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+208%
53
−208%
Valorant 293
+171%
100−110
−171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 93
+72.2%
50−55
−72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+195%
21
−195%
Dota 2 185
+180%
66
−180%
Far Cry 5 118
+174%
43
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+126%
50−55
−126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 123
+173%
45−50
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+227%
26
−227%
Valorant 180
+66.7%
100−110
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 148
+106%
70−75
−106%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 99
+330%
21−24
−330%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+190%
90−95
−190%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+682%
11
−682%
Metro Exodus 49
+145%
20
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+73.3%
100−110
−73.3%
Valorant 268
+102%
130−140
−102%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+118%
30−35
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+264%
10−12
−264%
Far Cry 5 88
+203%
29
−203%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+227%
30−33
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+280%
20−22
−280%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 98
+263%
27−30
−263%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+229%
7−8
−229%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+246%
24−27
−246%
Metro Exodus 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+269%
16−18
−269%
Valorant 210
+213%
65−70
−213%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+182%
16−18
−182%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Dota 2 121
+203%
40
−203%
Far Cry 5 46
+254%
12−14
−254%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+205%
21−24
−205%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+308%
12−14
−308%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 48
+300%
12−14
−300%

This is how RTX 2060 Super and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 197% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 230% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 26% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 682% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 Super surpassed Arc A370M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.89 11.45
Recency 9 July 2019 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 2060 Super has a 222.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13546 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 175 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2060 Super or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.