T600 vs GeForce MX450

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX450 with T600, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX450
2020
2 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 25 Watt
9.73

T600 outperforms MX450 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.9729.19
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896640
Core clock speed1395 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)40 Watt
Texture fill rate100.853.40
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX450 9.73
T600 16.85
+73.2%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
    • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
    • GeekBench 5 CUDA

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX450 3742
T600 6480
+73.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX450 8250
T600 8694
+5.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX450 22831
T600 344838
+1410%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX450 4725
T600 6552
+38.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX450 27570
T600 40917
+48.4%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX450 29016
+4.3%
T600 27832

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX450 335125
+10%
T600 304731

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX450 27944
+7.6%
T600 25964

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GeForce MX450 29969
+12.7%
T600 26600

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
−82.8%
53
+82.8%
1440p17
−52.9%
26
+52.9%
4K26
+23.8%
21
−23.8%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−65.2%
35−40
+65.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
−180%
27−30
+180%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−77.3%
35−40
+77.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−67.2%
100−110
+67.2%
Hitman 3 30
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−56.6%
80−85
+56.6%
Metro Exodus 55
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
−2.2%
45−50
+2.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 94
+13.3%
80−85
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−65.2%
35−40
+65.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−367%
27−30
+367%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−100%
24−27
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−77.3%
35−40
+77.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−67.2%
100−110
+67.2%
Hitman 3 29
−10.3%
30−35
+10.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−56.6%
80−85
+56.6%
Metro Exodus 37
−54.1%
55−60
+54.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−27.5%
51
+27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
+7.2%
80−85
−7.2%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−65.2%
35−40
+65.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−155%
27−30
+155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−225%
24−27
+225%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−77.3%
35−40
+77.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−67.2%
100−110
+67.2%
Hitman 3 25
−28%
30−35
+28%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−62.5%
39
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−50%
45
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−35%
27
+35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
−48.4%
45−50
+48.4%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−68.4%
30−35
+68.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Hitman 3 18
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−35%
27
+35%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−77.8%
32
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−67.2%
100−110
+67.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16
+129%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

This is how GeForce MX450 and T600 compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 83% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 53% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 24% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 23% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 1086% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • T600 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.73 16.85
Recency 1 August 2020 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce MX450 has 60% lower power consumption.

T600, on the other hand, has a 73.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
NVIDIA T600
T600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
1327 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
682 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.