Radeon 890M vs GeForce MX450

Place in the ranking	458	253
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.03	100.00
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 August 2020 (4 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	1024
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.8	185.6
Floating-point processing power	3.226 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX450 9.69

Radeon 890M 21.51
+122%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX450 3737

Radeon 890M 8299
+122%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX450 8250

Radeon 890M 15657
+89.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX450 22831

Radeon 890M 46360
+103%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX450 4725

Radeon 890M 8863
+87.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX450 27570

Radeon 890M 54704
+98.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX450 1900

Radeon 890M 3453
+81.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 −67.9%	47 +67.9%
1440p	19 −111%	40−45 +111%
4K	28 −114%	60−65 +114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−119%

70−75
+119%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 −110%	21−24 +110%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −104%	55−60 +104%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −119%	140−150 +119%
Hitman 3	30 +650%	4−5 −650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +563%	8−9 −563%
Metro Exodus	55 −118%	120−130 +118%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 −111%	95−100 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	94 +236%	27−30 −236%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 −100%	12−14 +100%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −108%	27−30 +108%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −104%	55−60 +104%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −119%	140−150 +119%
Hitman 3	29 +625%	4−5 −625%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +563%	8−9 −563%
Metro Exodus	37 −116%	80−85 +116%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −104%	55−60 +104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40 +900%	4−5 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 +218%	27−30 −218%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 −118%	24−27 +118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 −100%	16−18 +100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −119%	140−150 +119%
Hitman 3	25 +525%	4−5 −525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24 +200%	8−9 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +650%	4−5 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +122%	9−10 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7 −100%	14−16 +100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−110%

65−70
+110%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7 −100%	14−16 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −114%	90−95 +114%
Hitman 3	18 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −113%	130−140 +113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

26
+1200%

2−3

−1200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

This is how GeForce MX450 and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

Radeon 890M is 68% faster in 1080p
Radeon 890M is 111% faster in 1440p
Radeon 890M is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GeForce MX450 surpassed Radeon 890M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.69	21.51
Recency	1 August 2020	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 122% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.