HD Graphics 32EU Mobile vs GeForce MX450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.94no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1Bay Trail GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)2 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89632
Core clock speed1395 MHz311 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz646 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)4 Watt
Texture fill rate100.82.584
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS0.04134 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2+
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2020 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 4 Watt

GeForce MX450 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 and HD Graphics 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
Intel HD Graphics 32EU Mobile
HD Graphics 32EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1306 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.