Radeon RX Vega 2 vs GeForce MX350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.02no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640128
Core clock speed747 MHzno data
Boost clock speed937 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate29.98no data
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1752 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 2 years.

RX Vega 2, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1626 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 209 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.