ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce MX350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6051602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.95no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP107RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)1 May 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed747 MHz239 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate29.980.96
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2819
+140850%
Samples: 1261
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26no data
1440p27no data
4K26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 66 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 37 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11 no data
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Fortnite 82 no data
Forza Horizon 4 37 no data
Forza Horizon 5 25 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 129 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6 no data
Dota 2 83 no data
Far Cry 5 23 no data
Fortnite 43 no data
Forza Horizon 4 26 no data
Forza Horizon 5 16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35 no data
Metro Exodus 12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27 no data
Valorant 116 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data
Dota 2 76 no data
Far Cry 5 21 no data
Forza Horizon 4 19 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 28 Watt

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX350 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1770 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.