RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce MX350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
7.30

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms MX350 by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53862
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.0229.63
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405120
Core clock speed747 MHzno data
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate29.98no data
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.30
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.70
+581%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2811
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19149
+581%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX350 6166
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+575%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX350 4371
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+569%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX350 1336
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+859%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−554%
170−180
+554%
1440p31
−577%
210−220
+577%
4K25
−580%
170−180
+580%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
−536%
140−150
+536%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 26
−554%
170−180
+554%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
−557%
230−240
+557%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Hitman 3 20
−550%
130−140
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
−559%
850−900
+559%
Metro Exodus 37
−576%
250−260
+576%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
−556%
210−220
+556%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95
−532%
600−650
+532%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
−554%
170−180
+554%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−567%
40−45
+567%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
−547%
110−120
+547%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 23
−552%
150−160
+552%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
−580%
170−180
+580%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Hitman 3 20
−550%
130−140
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
−547%
750−800
+547%
Metro Exodus 28
−579%
190−200
+579%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
−567%
160−170
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
−580%
170−180
+580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−536%
140−150
+536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 88
−525%
550−600
+525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−525%
50−55
+525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
−567%
40−45
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
Hitman 3 17
−547%
110−120
+547%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−550%
130−140
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−567%
40−45
+567%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
−550%
130−140
+550%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Hitman 3 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−552%
300−310
+552%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Hitman 3 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%

This is how GeForce MX350 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 554% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 577% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 580% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.30 49.70
Recency 10 February 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 115 Watt

GeForce MX350 has 475% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 580.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1626 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 7 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.