HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce MX150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 with HD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.89
+89.4%

MX150 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking591758
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Power efficiency40.3814.21
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP108Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)5 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed937 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9126.40
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.103
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.89
+89.4%
HD Graphics P630 3.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2268
+89.3%
HD Graphics P630 1198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+117%
12−14
−117%
1440p30
+114%
14−16
−114%
4K20
+100%
10−12
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 26
+333%
6−7
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 20
+233%
6−7
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+371%
16−18
−371%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+335%
21−24
−335%
Metro Exodus 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+238%
8−9
−238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+177%
12−14
−177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+318%
16−18
−318%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+335%
21−24
−335%
Metro Exodus 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how GeForce MX150 and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX150 is 117% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX150 is 114% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX150 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 600% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 44% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX150 is ahead in 58 tests (94%)
  • HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.89 3.11
Recency 17 May 2017 5 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1740 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 89.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 135.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while HD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1636 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.