Radeon RX 6600 vs GeForce MX130

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with Radeon RX 6600, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.75

RX 6600 outperforms MX130 by a whopping 728% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking644113
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.39
Power efficiency10.8520.42
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed1122 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz2491 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate29.81279.0
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.75
RX 6600 39.31
+728%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1832
RX 6600 15147
+727%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX130 2875
RX 6600 31774
+1005%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX130 11968
RX 6600 94734
+692%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX130 2345
RX 6600 23366
+896%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX130 13610
RX 6600 145870
+972%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX130 170596
RX 6600 545762
+220%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−528%
113
+528%
1440p6−7
−850%
57
+850%
4K3−4
−933%
31
+933%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
1440pno data5.77
4Kno data10.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4
−2575%
107
+2575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2160%
113
+2160%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−950%
120−130
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−690%
75−80
+690%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1038%
91
+1038%
Far Cry 5 14
−507%
85−90
+507%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−537%
190−200
+537%
Hitman 3 9
−1000%
99
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−426%
160−170
+426%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1045%
120−130
+1045%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−450%
140−150
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−180%
120−130
+180%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−950%
120−130
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−690%
75−80
+690%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−813%
73
+813%
Far Cry 5 11
−673%
85−90
+673%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−537%
190−200
+537%
Hitman 3 10−11
−850%
95
+850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−426%
160−170
+426%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1045%
120−130
+1045%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−1038%
182
+1038%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−376%
80−85
+376%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−180%
120−130
+180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−690%
75−80
+690%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−638%
59
+638%
Far Cry 5 8
−963%
85−90
+963%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−537%
190−200
+537%
Hitman 3 10−11
−760%
86
+760%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
−992%
142
+992%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−1021%
157
+1021%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−1186%
90
+1186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−26.1%
58
+26.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Hitman 3 9−10
−500%
54
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−827%
102
+827%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−540%
190−200
+540%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−3540%
180−190
+3540%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1250%
50−55
+1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%

This is how GeForce MX130 and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 528% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 850% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 933% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 is 4900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is ahead in 68 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.75 39.31
Recency 17 November 2017 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 132 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 340% lower power consumption.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has a 727.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2253 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9742 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.