RTX A400 vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.06

RTX A400 outperforms MX130 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking666371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7120.22
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1122 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate29.8142.29
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2424
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.06
RTX A400 12.78
+215%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1816
RTX A400 5712
+215%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX130 6498
RTX A400 22833
+251%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX130 5110
RTX A400 21615
+323%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−206%
55−60
+206%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 27
−196%
80−85
+196%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 7
−200%
21−24
+200%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 20
−200%
60−65
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 14
−186%
40−45
+186%
Fortnite 32
−213%
100−105
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−204%
70−75
+204%
Valorant 55−60
−198%
170−180
+198%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−212%
240−250
+212%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Dota 2 35
−214%
110−120
+214%
Far Cry 5 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Fortnite 24
−213%
75−80
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Metro Exodus 3
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
−210%
65−70
+210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−186%
40−45
+186%
Valorant 55−60
−198%
170−180
+198%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Dota 2 28
−204%
85−90
+204%
Far Cry 5 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
−186%
40−45
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−200%
21−24
+200%
Valorant 55−60
−198%
170−180
+198%
Fortnite 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Fortnite 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Fortnite 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how GeForce MX130 and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A400 is 206% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 12.78
Recency 17 November 2017 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 214.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
2344 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8
27 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.