RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.75

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms MX130 by a whopping 867% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.77
Power efficiency11.0445.75
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed1122 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate29.81187.4
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2488
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.75
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.92
+867%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1834
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17715
+866%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX130 6507
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 87227
+1241%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX130 5051
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 84610
+1575%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−844%
170−180
+844%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.82

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4
−775%
35−40
+775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 14
−829%
130−140
+829%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−867%
290−300
+867%
Hitman 3 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−835%
290−300
+835%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−862%
250−260
+862%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−867%
290−300
+867%
Hitman 3 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−835%
290−300
+835%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−838%
150−160
+838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 8
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−867%
290−300
+867%
Hitman 3 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
−823%
120−130
+823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−829%
130−140
+829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−829%
65−70
+829%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
Hitman 3 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−867%
290−300
+867%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

This is how GeForce MX130 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 844% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.75 45.92
Recency 17 November 2017 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 70 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 866.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2209 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.