GeForce 920A vs MX130

Place in performance ranking	639	860
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	N16S-GTR	GK208B
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 January 2018 (6 years ago)	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	1122 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	1242 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15-25 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.81	30.53
Floating-point performance	0.9539 gflops	0.7327 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	16.02 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.77
+120%

GeForce 920A 2.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1841
+120%

GeForce 920A 836

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

19
+138%

8−9

−138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Hitman 3	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 +160%	10−11 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Hitman 3	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	8 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Hitman 3	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	13 +160%	5−6 −160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+160%

5−6
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Hitman 3	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

This is how GeForce MX130 and GeForce 920A compete in popular games:

GeForce MX130 is 138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.77	2.17
Recency	1 January 2018	13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt

GeForce MX130 has a 119.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 120% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while GeForce 920A is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.