Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce MX110

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.72

T2000 Mobile outperforms MX110 by a whopping 458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking713269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.5423.83
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM108STU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed978 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate16.10114.2
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.72
T2000 Mobile 20.77
+458%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1430
T2000 Mobile 7985
+458%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX110 2121
T2000 Mobile 13524
+538%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−431%
85−90
+431%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Elden Ring 8−9
−725%
65−70
+725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Metro Exodus 10
−460%
55−60
+460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−262%
45−50
+262%
Valorant 5−6
−1580%
80−85
+1580%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Dota 2 21
−248%
70−75
+248%
Elden Ring 8−9
−725%
65−70
+725%
Far Cry 5 23
−196%
65−70
+196%
Fortnite 17
−541%
100−110
+541%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−462%
70−75
+462%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−600%
55−60
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 34
−306%
130−140
+306%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−408%
65−70
+408%
Valorant 5−6
−1580%
80−85
+1580%
World of Tanks 45
−424%
230−240
+424%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Dota 2 33
−121%
70−75
+121%
Far Cry 5 15
−353%
65−70
+353%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8
−1625%
130−140
+1625%
Valorant 5−6
−1580%
80−85
+1580%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Elden Ring 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−562%
170−180
+562%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
World of Tanks 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Valorant 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Elden Ring 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−520%
60−65
+520%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Fortnite 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Valorant 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GeForce MX110 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 431% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.72 20.77
Recency 17 November 2017 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 60 Watt

GeForce MX110 has 100% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 458.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2314 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 398 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.