HD Graphics 405 vs GeForce Go 7600

Place in the ranking	1320	1173
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	8.46
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	G73	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2006 (18 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	13	128
Core clock speed	450 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	9.600
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	2
TMUs	8	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	350 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	3.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.3
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

6−7

−150%

15
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Valorant	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Valorant	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Valorant	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

1−2

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

0−1

This is how Go 7600 and HD Graphics 405 compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 405 is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the HD Graphics 405 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD Graphics 405 is ahead in 21 test (62%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	0.74
Recency	1 March 2006	1 April 2015
Chip lithography	90 nm	14 nm

HD Graphics 405 has a 124.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce Go 7600

HD Graphics 405

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce Go 7600

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.8 221 vote

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 or HD Graphics 405, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.