Tesla P6 vs GeForce Go 6800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1344not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV41GP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 November 2004 (20 years ago)24 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores172048
Core clock speed300 MHz1012 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors190 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600192.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.169 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs12128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIMXM-B (3.0)
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2004 24 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 90 Watt

Go 6800 has 100% lower power consumption.

Tesla P6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 and Tesla P6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook card while Tesla P6 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
NVIDIA Tesla P6
Tesla P6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla P6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.