Radeon Graphics vs GeForce Go 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6600 with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.


Go 6600
2005
256 MB DDR
0.16

Graphics outperforms Go 6600 by a whopping 1044% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1481966
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiencyno data9.39
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV43 A2Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12448
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed375 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40042.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6600 0.16
Radeon Graphics 1.83
+1044%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6600 69
Samples: 20
Radeon Graphics 764
+1007%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Valorant 24−27
−1025%
270−280
+1025%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 24−27
−1025%
270−280
+1025%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 24−27
−1025%
270−280
+1025%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 1.83
Chip lithography 110 nm 7 nm

Graphics has a 1044% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1471% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8245 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6600 or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.