Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1556not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.19no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)28 January 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7128
Core clock speed300 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors75 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2003.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 100 Watt

Go 6200 has 525% lower power consumption.

R2 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.