Arc B580 vs GeForce GTX TITAN

#ad 
Buy
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN Z
VS
Arc B570 Arc B580

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN and Arc B580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX TITAN
2013
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.50

Arc B580 outperforms GTX TITAN by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
Arc B580 Arc B580

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.1893.21
Power efficiency5.8014.47
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGK110BMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 February 2013 (12 years ago)13 December 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 2831% better value for money than GTX TITAN.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26882560
Core clock speed837 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate196.2427.2
Floating-point processing power4.709 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs224160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm272 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384-bit GDDR5192 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN 20.50
Arc B580 38.87
+89.6%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN 8196
Arc B580 15541
+89.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−92.3%
125
+92.3%
1440p35−40
−94.3%
68
+94.3%
4K21−24
−100%
42
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.37
−672%
1.99
+672%
1440p28.54
−679%
3.66
+679%
4K47.57
−702%
5.93
+702%
  • Arc B580 has 672% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc B580 has 679% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc B580 has 702% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 112
+0%
112
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 134
+0%
134
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 193
+0%
193
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 101
+0%
101
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 236
+0%
236
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
+0%
54
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 32
+0%
32
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 92% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 94% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.50 38.87
Recency 19 February 2013 13 December 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 190 Watt

Arc B580 has a 89.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
Arc B580 Arc B580
vs
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
ATI HD 5850 HD 5850
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
K2000M Quadro K2000M
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
GT 640M GT 640M
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 7400G HD 7400G
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 6370M HD 6370M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
165 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
578 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.