Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

Place in the ranking	160	252
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.13	15.63
Power efficiency	9.28	10.27
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GM200	Ellesmere
GCN generation	no data	4th Gen
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	no data	reference
Release date	17 March 2015 (9 years ago)	29 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 480 has 92% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2304
Compute units	no data	36
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1120 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	1266 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	209.1	182.3
Floating-point processing power	6.691 TFLOPS	5.834 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	192	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	n/a
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
SLI options	4x	-
Bridgeless CrossFire	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	224 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
Eyefinity	-	+
HDMI	+	2.0
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort support	-	1.4HDR
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	n/a
CrossFire	-	+
Enduro	-	n/a
FRTC	-	+
FreeSync	-	+
HD3D	-	n/a
LiquidVR	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
TressFX	-	+
TrueAudio	-	n/a
ZeroCore	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+
GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
Mantle	-	n/a
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN X 33.69
+50.6%

RX 480 22.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12950
+50.6%

RX 480 8600

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +42.9%	77 −42.9%
1440p	75−80 +44.2%	52 −44.2%
4K	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.08 −205%	2.97 +205%
1440p	13.32 −202%	4.40 +202%
4K	19.98 −205%	6.54 +205%

RX 480 has 205% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 480 has 202% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 480 has 205% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Elden Ring	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	52 +0%	52 +0%
Elden Ring	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry 5	51 +0%	51 +0%
Fortnite	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	78 +0%	78 +0%
Metro Exodus	16 +0%	16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	78 +0%	78 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	34 +0%	34 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 +0%	30 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	285 +0%	285 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	29 +0%	29 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	64 +0%	64 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	37 +0%	37 +0%
Elden Ring	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21 +0%	21 +0%
World of Tanks	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	50 +0%	50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Elden Ring	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 +0%	36 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 +0%	15 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 +0%	70 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 +0%	36 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	88 +0%	88 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	28 +0%	28 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RX 480 compete in popular games:

GTX TITAN X is 43% faster in 1080p
GTX TITAN X is 44% faster in 1440p
GTX TITAN X is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.69	22.37
Recency	17 March 2015	29 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt